Prospect Info: The 2018 Draft Thread

Discussion in 'Edmonton Oilers' started by Soli, Jun 26, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
View Users: View Users
  1. CantHaveTkachev

    CantHaveTkachev hehehe

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Messages:
    25,907
    Likes Received:
    1,636
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St. OILbert
    Barrett Hayton going top 10 shows just how desperate some teams would be for centers

    he's like Bo Horvat from the info I've read
     
  2. Zaddy

    Zaddy Retired.

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2013
    Messages:
    9,462
    Likes Received:
    951
    Trophy Points:
    109
    I can verify that he did have McAvoy 3rd. He repeated it many times prior to the draft, similarly to how he is talking about guys like Merkley, Addison and Nordgren now.
     
  3. Bryanbryoil

    Bryanbryoil Magician

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    66,036
    Likes Received:
    1,818
    Trophy Points:
    196
    If Hayton and Kotkaniemi are off the board by #10, then a very good D or winger will be there at 10 for us.
     
    Mcnotloilersfan and nabob like this.
  4. BarDownBobo

    BarDownBobo Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Messages:
    4,580
    Likes Received:
    223
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Location:
    City of Champions
    It'll entirely depend on the Habs imo. If they go with a dman I think just Kotkaniemi will be gone before the Oil pick, but if they go way off the board and take Kotkaniemi then I could see Hayton possibly going to Chicago/NYR.
     
  5. Debonair

    Debonair PS4

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    681
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    76
    And Bo Horvat was a pretty good pick.
     
    A91 likes this.
  6. westbeast

    westbeast Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2017
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    21
    Player comparisons for the top 10 and smith?
     
  7. McFlash97

    McFlash97 Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2017
    Messages:
    1,642
    Likes Received:
    885
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Gender:
    Male
    McAvoy blows Smith away in almost every single category. Just watching Smith conjures up a Taylor Chorney with slightly worse skating. Im sorry, there is absolutely nothing about his game that will help the Oilers within the next 5 years minimum. His high point total will not equate to the NHL. He is not a great skater, he is small, has a bad shot, not a great passer, his hockey IQ may be above average hence his high point total. Other then that , this is NOT what the Oilers need. A small , not dynamic defenseman. Its ludicrous he would be considered over Boqvist. You take that chance on Boqvist 10/10 times. You get him on a training regiment, you get him a defensive coach and you work with him. You dont take a lesser player.

    The Oilers need to take a chnace on drafting a dynamic defeseman and work with him every single day. There hasn't been one in this city since Coffey and Pronger. Ty Smith isnt going to impress or tilt the ice for anyone.
     
  8. Jimmi McJenkins

    Jimmi McJenkins Sometimes Miracles

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    50,098
    Likes Received:
    639
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Public Servant
    Location:
    Alberta
    :facepalm: FFS, that's just dumb.
     
  9. CycloneSweep

    CycloneSweep Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2017
    Messages:
    8,235
    Likes Received:
    2,946
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Gender:
    Male
    Your list actually looks pretty good in retrospect
     
  10. McFlash97

    McFlash97 Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2017
    Messages:
    1,642
    Likes Received:
    885
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Gender:
    Male
    There's no such thing as a dumb opinion.... unless your a homer of another canadian team....
     
  11. gordonhught

    gordonhught Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    573
    Likes Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Not a Ty Smith fan?
     
  12. CantHaveTkachev

    CantHaveTkachev hehehe

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Messages:
    25,907
    Likes Received:
    1,636
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St. OILbert
    poor comparison then
     
  13. Johnny McBravo

    Johnny McBravo Hello Connor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2010
    Messages:
    5,833
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Location:
    Canada
    He's setting himself up for less disappointment.

    It's a win win. If We end up drafting ty smith he's already gotten his grievances in order, if we don't it makes the pick that much better.

    That being said, I would still be severely disappointed with Smith, especially with one of the higher ceiling players available. Bob and Gregor have been pumping Smith's tires and it makes me sick, especially knowing how this org uses Media to prep the fans for disappointing moves.
     
  14. gordonhught

    gordonhught Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    573
    Likes Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    51
    In my mind, you do not take Ty Smith in the top 10. Maybe 11-12.
     
  15. LaGu

    LaGu Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    4,239
    Likes Received:
    388
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    Luxembourg
    You went over the top in a big way though, with that specific sentence he quoted.
     
  16. LaGu

    LaGu Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    4,239
    Likes Received:
    388
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    Luxembourg
    Then you put a fwd vs a D, probably.

    The difference between 10, 11 and 12 almost non-existant. Then you go for need, i.e. D.
     
  17. Draiskull

    Draiskull Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2005
    Messages:
    20,618
    Likes Received:
    268
    Trophy Points:
    154
    Why is LD a need? We should draft anything but a LD.
     
  18. Aerrol

    Aerrol ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2014
    Messages:
    4,548
    Likes Received:
    885
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Eh. We need high-end defensive prospects, full stop. Smith has the tools to easily be considered that. The issue I have is taking him over the amazing RHD options that may fall to us...especially Boqvist.
     
  19. nabob

    nabob :]

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    19,073
    Likes Received:
    1,909
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    HF boards
    So it's ok if we took him 11 or 12th but no way would you take him 10th?
     
  20. gordonhught

    gordonhught Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    573
    Likes Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Not with the better players available no.

    Dahlen, Svech, Zadina, Boq, Wahl, Tka, Kot, Hughes, Bou, and Dob all better players.

    If those players are all gone by 10, then you can take Smith.
     
    HailMcJesus, CycloneSweep and 780il like this.
  21. Jimmi McJenkins

    Jimmi McJenkins Sometimes Miracles

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    50,098
    Likes Received:
    639
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Public Servant
    Location:
    Alberta
    That's just so dumb
     
  22. Jimmi McJenkins

    Jimmi McJenkins Sometimes Miracles

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    50,098
    Likes Received:
    639
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Public Servant
    Location:
    Alberta
    There are absolutely Dumb opinions, like yours comparing Smith, a top-15 rated prospect in a deep draft with a player who's been a marginal NHLer for years and never had anything reassembling the upside of Smith.

    I get it guys, the Oilers might be interested, so many of you have decided he's garbage and is terrible, but none of that is true and it's like just a larger personal bias you aren't dealing with.
     
    McHockeyfan91 and nabob like this.
  23. dustrock

    dustrock Too Legit To Quit

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    7,657
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    81
    I think at 10, if you have a fit, take that player. I mean we picked MPS at #10 and thought we got a steal that day.

    Unless someone like Hughes somehow falls to us, I think you can make a case for any of about 7 players for the Oilers to take.

    This is isn't like when I was adamant the Oilers had to pick Draisaitl if we didn't get Ekblad. :p
     
    nabob likes this.
  24. MoneyGuy

    MoneyGuy Wandering

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Messages:
    6,380
    Likes Received:
    673
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Gender:
    Male
    Of course there are. Flat earthers, Donald Trump tweets...do I need to go on?
     
  25. McCupofOil

    McCupofOil Still Evaluating

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2009
    Messages:
    25,019
    Likes Received:
    2,104
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    5-14-6-1
    Why is it dumb? All those guys are better prospects. If the Oilers take Smith at 10, it'll be a bit of a reach.
     
    The Hound and gordonhught like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"